SpotFakesAI™
DEMO — synthetic example. No real person or scan is involved.

Dating / romance conversation · Oct 31, 2026 · Completed

High riskExperimental risk indicator: 82/100Evidence coverage: Moderate

The indicator is experimental and rules-based, not a probability that this person is a scammer. A low score would not guarantee safety.

Summary

After two weeks of chatting, the other person asked for gift-card payment tied to an urgent story and pushed to move apps. Check unavailable: profile photos, account history, or identity.

Warning signs

High severity

"Can you send $400 in Apple gift cards so I can fix my visa?"

Why it matters: Requests for gift-card payment are a hallmark of advance-fee and romance fraud; gift cards are hard to trace or reverse.

Other explanation: Rarely legitimate — real visa fees are paid to governments, not via gift cards.

Medium severity

"Let's talk on Telegram instead, this app is buggy."

Why it matters: Moving off-platform removes the dating app's safety tools and reporting.

Other explanation: Some people simply prefer other apps; this alone isn't proof of anything.

Low severity

"My camera has been broken for weeks."

Why it matters: Can be used to avoid video calls.

Other explanation: Reluctance to video call is common and is never treated as proof of wrongdoing.

External checks

  • Domain reputationCheck unavailable
  • Reverse image searchCheck unavailable
  • Account historyCheck unavailable

Suggested next steps

  • Do not send money, gift cards or crypto.
  • Keep the conversation on the original app and save screenshots.
  • Report the profile to the platform's support team.
  • If you already paid, contact the card issuer and report at reportfraud.ftc.gov.

What would change this assessment?

A consent-based live video call, verifiable details through official channels, or the money request being withdrawn.